Saturday, February 26, 2011

Ways To Mount The Projector On A Drop Cieling

Val Visdende (02/25/2011)



third exit Val Visdende in less than a month. Dark slightly lower output record of 8/2/2011. The SQM has come to touch 21.80 Gegenshein but was more difficult to view. Even the star of 7.11 near M81 was more to the limit.
This time it was almost a starparty: there was me, Lorenzo Burti, Andrea Francescon, Mars4ever, Vesna, ToolMaynard. Dopbson 60 cm, 50 cm, 35 cm, 35 cm and 30 cm. The really negative note
of this output was seeing, that is to say bad still be generous. The star had the effect 160x "stellarium" (floppy sgumati). Later in the night, the situation has improved slightly (the zenith) and we also used a few more magnification, but have never seen the star point (even at only 100x). We had some
the global list, but because of seeing we dropped. I have not even been able to show very well the new Explore Scientific 100 ° 9 mm. In retrospect, I think with a kind of seeing is probably best not to leave (because the bad seeing was widely expected by meteoblue). Saturn, observed at the end of the evening was so amorphous that they could hardly see the curves between the rings and planet.

The temperature has dropped to about -12 ° C (according to SQM), -6 ° C according to the thermometer outside my car. The humidity was virtually absent: no external capacitor on anything. The thing was irrelevant with regard to my two ETHOS and humidity have it in and I've always kept under the action of the anti-fog strips (which almost was not enough, given the cold - in fact the bands can not warm up completely eye so big; serve two bands for the eyes).

The most important object in the night was undoubtedly NGC 4449, irregular galaxy in a CNV. We osservta at various magnifications and showed a good amount of detail and condensation. The figure at the beginning of this article tries to give an idea of \u200b\u200bwhat was visible. The image has suffered the seeing (with a seeing better would surely have been much more detailed). In Overall, however, several condensations were visible at magnifications between 160x and 380x (380x we went to the ES 9 mm). The vision was better overall with the Ethos Qualle 13 to 265x.

Other items were of some importance in my opinion, Arp 2 and the antenna (see below).

below lists the items that I have given (but there were others).

NGC 2420 (Open Cluster in Gemini), at 23:47:11. 21.66 SQM.

Eskimo Nebula - NGC 2392 (Planetary Nebula in Gemini), 23:59. Seeig horrible. Visible when structures in onion, but not the face of a clown.

Messier 109 (Spiral Galaxy in Ursa Major), 00:17 hours. You can see hints of the bar and spirals. Osservata a 160.

NGC 3953 (Spiral Galaxy in Ursa Major), ore 00:18.

NGC 4026 (Spiral Galaxy in Ursa Major), ore 00:37. SQM 21.76.

NGC 4088 (Spiral Galaxy in Ursa Major), ore 00:44.

NGC 4085 (Spiral Galaxy in Ursa Major), ore 00:45.

NGC 4157 (Spiral Galaxy in Ursa Major), ore 00:45.

NGC 4100 (Spiral Galaxy in Ursa Major), ore 00:45.

NGC 4485 (Irregular Galaxy in Canes Venatici), ore 01:14

Cocoon Galaxy - NGC 4490 (Spiral Galaxy in Canes Venatici) ore 01:14. Fa parte di Arp 2 insieme a NGC 4485. Osservata a 160x, evidenzia la forma a fagiolo con la coda distorta dalla compagna.

Messier 106 (Spiral Galaxy in Canes Venatici), ore 01:15.

NGC 4217 (Spiral Galaxy in Canes Venatici), ore 01:15.

NGC 4449 (Irregular Galaxy in Canes Venatici), ore 01:16. L'oggetto più spettacolare della serata. Galassia irregolare mostra diverse condensazioni di stelle e/o zone di emissione. Osservata al meglio a 265x, ma anche a 202x, 345x, 380x (un po' scura), e con il filtro UHC che evidenziava un po' meglio le zone a emisione. SQM 21.80.

NGC 4725 (Spiral Galaxy in Coma Berenices), ore 02:12. Si vede la forma a ""tie fighter"" con una barra centrale, il nucleo e due archi di spirale simmetrici rispetto alla barra. Osservata a 265x al meglio. La forma era visibile anche to 160x.

Spindle Galaxy - Messier 102 (Spiral Galaxy in Draco), at 03:15.

NGC 5907 (Spiral Galaxy in Draco), at 03:16. It is shaped like a thin August 21.70 SQM.

Antennae Galaxies - NGC 4039 (Spiral Galaxy in Corvus), at 03:26. Two nuclei are visible on the twisted one. Observed at 50 cm in the 125X and 100X, 160x, 265x and 380x in 60 cm. Make the most of the 160-265x. A bit 'like this photo but without the fine details in the body of the two galaxies.

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

Mount Blade With Crossover Mac

Bortle almost 1! Val Visdende 08.02.2011 (21.83) A

Another week out (I take the series in counterattacking the weather). Another successful night. A part of the plain, to Conegliano, was under a dense fog. The foothills But it was free, so light pollution was not as small as possible. However we have found what for me is the night record, with the SQM rose to 21.83 (average of several readings with peaks at 21.86-21.88). SQM The two basic (and that of my Mars4ever) were quite in agreement, to ToolMaynard (an SQM-L) gives some more pessimistic reading (typically one tenth) but perhaps in part because of the night in which felt more was used the weight of the Milky Way overhead. Darkness is in fact increased as they went down the Milky Way, reaching a maximum at night with the galactic center at the zenith.

Light pollution was quite visible on the horizon Minimum only some slight glimmer in a sky that was more transparent in very low (allowing you to see many constellations Australia). The

Gegenshein, between Leo and Cancer, it was immediately apparent, almost easy. The first to notice it was ToolMaynard, before knowing the location where it should be. Looking a bit 'better you could also track the zodiacal band, although this was more difficult to see.

We spent some time looking to see M81 with the naked eye. I followed the method of Brian Skiff http://www.observers.org/tac.mailing.list/2001/July/0592.html. In particular, first identifying the star HD 83489 (mv 5.7) and HD 89343 = EN UMa (Mv 6). In the line that unites them, a quarter of the distance from the side of EN, was visible in the star HD 87703 mv 7.11. This star has been obvious to all, I would say that was visible at least 50% of the time. At half the distance from EN to the HD83489, there was another "thing" Skiff said to correspond to a trio of stars. To me it seemed (according to Skiff) more uncertain of the star of 7.11 even though the integrated magnitude of these is 6.8 (Skiff also reported as the most difficult of 7.11). There were other "things" around, but not along the line joining EN-HD83489. Along these lines, however, a quarter of the distance from the side but there had to be HD83489 M81. I had the impression of seeing her at the time which moved a bit by changing the eyes' diverted the direction of observation. In practice, when I observed in the distracted but maintain the angle at which I observed in diverted saw nothing, but suddenly the eye moving and moving slightly the point on the retina seemed to me to see an extended object, which then gradually disappeared from view.
Mars4ever ToolMaynard and did not see (but I'm the one who insisted more). In any case I can not be sure of seeing it as something that is really the limit and could also be suggestive. So far there are only very few people in the world who claim to have seen her, more or less with descriptions like this (in fact I did as Skiff http://www.seds.org/messier/xtra/supp/m81naked.txt ).

store this observation to the limits of the incredible (do not bet on that) here is a list of other objects observed and the progression of SQM and temperature. I searched for pictures if you like to see what the telescope (or at least not overly rich in detail that the telescope had not seen).

Haro 3-75 (Planetary Nebula in Orion), at 00:06. Not seen (but I was hasty, perhaps I have not identified educational purposes, since it is declared as an easy subject to a 24 "http://observing.skyhound.com/archives/jan/H_3-75.html).

21.68 SQM. Gegenshein the Visible between Cancer and Leo.

ngc2997 (Spiral Galaxy in Antlia), at 00:14. Front view. Bright nucleus and alone with traces of spirals.

IC 421 (Spiral Galaxy in Orion), at 00:24. It appears as a faint circular glow. An observation with a 20 "is shown here: http://www.visualdeepsky.org/logs/msg00195.html

NGC 2022 (Planetary Nebula in Orion), at 00:26. Observed at 265x. It looks like a elliptical disk (not distinguished the middle).

Abell 12 (Planetary Nebula in Orion), at 00:44. It looks like a small bubble immersed in the halo of light do mu Orionis (265x).

Unfortunately I suffered through the night a fluctuating situation of halos of light around the brightest stars, in part due to the fact that my expensive Ethos (otherwise excellent) have the vocation to condense inside (despite the anti bands Condesa), partly due to the fact that I have to redo the aluminizing of the primary (but here the discussion would be long).

21.71 SQM

NGC 2174 (Bright Nebula in Orion), at 01:06. Great nebula surrounding a star. Visible light than dark and dark nebulae in overlap (160x).

21.69 SQM, temperature -5 ° C

Observations of M81 with the naked eye.

21.72 SQM.

IC 342 (Spiral Galaxy in Camelopardalis), at 01:48. One can sense a vague swirl about half the field in 35 mm (100x). You see maybe a little 'better with UHC-S.

IC 356 (Spiral Galaxy in Camelopardalis), at 02:09. Small elliptical visible with 160x.

NGC 1560 (Spiral Galaxy in Camelopardalis), at 02:18. Cutting thin galaxy. Observed at 265x.

21.76 SQM, temperature -8 ° C

NGC 2146 / A (Spiral Galaxy in Camelopardalis), at 02:22.

NGC 2715 (Spiral Galaxy in Camelopardalis), at 02:43. "It looks like a spiral of three quarters."

21.80 SQM

NGC 2655 (Spiral Galaxy in Camelopardalis), at 02:48. I think we have seen the supernova (but did not know in advance where he was, but it was a very bright star on the edge of the galaxy).

Other observations of M81 with the naked eye.

NGC 2403 (Spiral Galaxy in Camelopardalis), at 03:09. He realized the spiral and an emission zone.

21.82 SQM

Messier 68 (Globular Cluster in Hydra), at 03:35.

Messier 100 (Spiral Galaxy in Coma Berenices), at 03:43. Spirals visible at 160x. Visible two smaller companions.

Coma Pinwheel Galaxy - Messier 99 (Spiral Galaxy in Coma Berenices), at 03:51. We see three spiral arms in 160x. At 265x you can see very well.

Abell 35 (Planetary Nebula in Hydra), 04:11 hours. Uncertain vision to the limit. OIII 100x.

21.83 SQM

Messier 83 (Spiral Galaxy in Hydra), at 04:15. Bar visible and dark between two bar loops and spirals, although a bit 'washed out due to the high horizon.

Note: when I seemed to see M81 also had the impression that it was still a floppy disk or an extended object. But I do not believe it myself because I would be among the few people in the world. As Brent says Archinal in response to Brian Skiff:

Congratulations on the naked-eye observation of M 81
. By my count, this Brings to four the number of people who
Been Able to do so, Including Stephen O'Meara, myself, and Aristides
Tzarellas (Webb Society Deep-Sky Observer, "Oct., 1996, p. 1). Could you also see
SAO 15100 (V = 7.2) to the east? This Was The faintest star visible
in the area (10 degrees above the horizon!) When I managed my
observation from Colorado.

Brent

Monday, February 7, 2011

The Best Knee Workout

Omeopatia: un approccio “culturomico”

(post written for the Special Homeopathy of Query and online Science Today )
January 14 Jean-Baptiste Michel, Aiden Erez Lieberman and several other authors, related to the Cultural Harvard University Observatory, at the 'Encyclopaedia Britannica , all' American Heritage Dictionary or the Google search engine, published on Science an interesting work entitled Quantitative Analysis of Cultures Using Millions of Digitized Books . As you know, Google has now scanned over fifteen million volumes (about il 12% di tutti quelli pubblicati). Gli autori dell’articolo hanno selezionato, basandosi sulla qualità delle scansioni e dei dati bibliografici forniti, oltre cinque milioni di libri pubblicati fra il XVI e il XXI secolo, formando un corpus di cinquecento miliardi di parole (fra queste, 300 miliardi in inglese, 45 in francese, 37 in tedesco). Hanno poi definito insiemi composti da una a cinque parole, chiamati N-gram . Dividendo il numero di occorrenze di un determinato N-gram per il numero di parole nel corpus per quel determinato anno si ottiene così la frequenza d’uso di quella parola nell’anno oggetto d’interesse, ed è così possibile individuare i picchi to use a certain word (or group of words) in a time series study and so the linguistic and cultural changes. The authors called their approach "culturomica ( culturomics ). How to write in their article: The
culturomica is the application of collection and analysis of high-performance data to the study of human culture. The books are the beginning, but we need to incorporate newspapers, manuscripts, maps, artwork, and a host of other human creations. Of course, many voices - have already lost some time - will be forever unattainable.
culturomica results are a new type of evidence in science human. As with the fossils of ancient creatures, the challenge of culturomica lies in the interpretation of [that] evidence.
on a specific site , the authors have released a browser for viewing data (called Google Ngram Viewer ) and raw data used for new calculations by other researchers.
Historians Mike Dash and Egil Asprem have already tried to apply the Google Ngram Viewer in terms relative to their respective fields of research (related to us): the problem fortiani el'esoterismo. This special is the opportunity to follow their example and have a browse at the frequency of use of "homeopathy" between 1815 and 2000 in three different corpus: the German, French and English, as viewed through the viewer:
Search for Homöopathie, books published in German between 1815 and 2000

Search homéopathie, Homéopathie, books published in French between 1815 and 2000
Search homeopathy, Homeopathy, books published in English between 1815 and 2000

The instrument has its limitations (some of which have been highlighted, among others, Brett Holman and, yet, by Egil Asprem ) and the curators of the project are listed (in sections V and VI FAQ ) some things to keep in mind when interpreting the data. We can, however, with a pinch, try to make a few observations: Christian Friedrich Samuel Hahnemann (1755-1843) was born and practiced primarily in Saxony, it is not surprising then that the word has spread first in German rather than in French (in France the practice was introduced in 1830 by the homeopathic physician Sebastiano Caserta Guidi (1769-1863) and the Hahnemann moved there in 1835, the peak Homéopathie between 1824 and 1830 is probably an artifact) or English (it was introduced in the United States in 1825 and the United Kingdom a few years later ). More interesting is the comparison of frequencies between different languages \u200b\u200bover time: for example, if German and French is a (possible) increase in interest in the second half of the 30s of the twentieth century, English is quite recognizable a decline, then all three graphs show an explosion in the popularity of the term in the three last decades of the twentieth century, even in times and different ways.
Also interesting is the following graph that compares the frequencies of words, homeopathy and acupuncture:
Search homeopathy, acupuncture , books published in English between 1815 and 2000
How do you remember the project site, the Google Ngram Viewer is still only a tool for viewing and there is no need to make hasty assumptions about the nature of trends that we published, we hope, however, to inspire some scholars a compiere ricerche che, integrando i dati grezzi resi disponibili da Cultoromics con le metodologie e le fonti proprie dei cultural e science studies , possano fornirci importanti informazioni sul come l’omeopatia si sia diffusa nelle differenti aree culturali e sulle ragioni del suo successo, o insuccesso, culturale in funzione del tempo.

E in italiano?

Purtroppo il numero di libri digitalizzati da Google per la nostra lingua è ancora troppo ridotto e quindi non è disponibile un corpus. L’ accordo fra il Ministero per i Beni e le Attività Culturali e Google dello scorso marzo fa sperare che questo limite sarà presto exceeded, at least for the period not longer covered by copyright.
However, we can already use the power of Google Books to study, for example, the formation of the vocabulary used by the governing alternative. We know that homeopathy has become widespread in Italy since 1821 by the Kingdom of Sicily, although occasional articles which referred to the research of Hahnemann (Anemanno or, as sometimes the name was made in Italian), had already appeared on some regular language Italian in previous years. But when it appeared the words that define it? The traditional lexicographical repertoires have the limitation of being often the result of manual profiling and coverage lexicons details is not always optimal. The first recorded claims of a word can be a number of years, decades and sometimes centuries after the actual entry into the language.
For us, the unsurpassed DELI - etymological dictionary of the Italian language (Cortellazzo - Zolli, 1999) back to 1828 for
  • homeopathy and allopathy (in dictionary technical etymological and philological Abbot Marco Aurelio Marks, published in two volumes in Milan that year, but when a word is recorded from a dictionary, it is usually already in a somewhat diffuse);
  • il 1834 per omiopatista ('seguace dell'omeopatia', omeopatista nel 1891);
  • avanti il 1835 per l'aggettivo omiopatico (il 1859 -o forse il 1855, la voce non è chiara- per omeopatico , la forma oggi sopravvissuta; ma nel 2005 Fiorenzo Toso (Toso, 2005: 454) ha potuto retrodatarla al 1840);
  • avanti il 1862 per l’identico sostantivo ('chi cura gli ammalati col metodo dell'omeopatia'; con lo stesso senso omeopatico , 1874-75);
  • il 1872 (in Vittorio Alfieri) per l'aggettivo allopatico .
Da parte sua, lo Zingarelli (Zingarelli, 2010), che sfrutta un proprio corpus lessicale, anticipa omeopatia al 1826, allopatico al 1840 e aggiunge omeopata (1978). Un controllo sul recentissimo vocabolario etimologico di Alberto Nocentini (Nocentini, 2010) non porta a datazioni diverse rispetto a quelle già indicate.
Ora, pur tenendo conto del fatto che, come abbiamo già ricordato, la base dati è ancora limitata e non esente da errori, attraverso una rapida ricerca con Google Libri possiamo comunque proporre qualche modifica al quadro che appare negli strumenti lessicografici che abbiamo esaminato.
Già nel 1816, la forma oggi corrente dell’aggettivo "Homeopathic" appeared, the women in state of medicine during the years 1805-1814 Curt Sprengel.
In the '20s, "omopatia" [1] appeared in a letter from Germany dated "Dresden, 25 August 1820" and published in the October 1820 issue of Italian Library, in 1822 there emerged two forms not very successful, "omoiopatia" and "omoiopatico" (adjective in the feminine) and one that is still used, the word "allopathic," the first monograph devoted to the system of Hahnemann of the Italian peninsula, Il sistema medico del dottor Samuele Hahnemann pubblicato a Napoli nel 1822 dal medico danese Joergen Johan Albrecht von Schoenberg (1782-1841) riprendendo il testo della sua relazione all'Accademia delle Scienze della capitale del Regno nel novembre precedente; “omiopatia”, “omiopatista” e l’aggettivo “omiopatico” sono attestabili dal 1824, quando apparvero in una delle traduzioni dell’opera principale del medico tedesco che in quegli anni vedranno la luce nella penisola italica, l’ Organo dell'arte medica , tradotta (a partire dalla seconda edizione tedesca del 1819) e pubblicata da Giuseppe Antonio Gaimari (1779-1839) con several critical notes (which are primarily our terms), "allopathic" or "allopathic" ('supporter of the current medicine', the first in the plural) made their appearance, respectively, in 1826 and 1828 parts editorial that the doctor Francesco Romani Vasto (1785-1852), one of the pioneers of the discipline in Italy, wished to precede the two volumes of his translation of another text dell'Hahnemann, the pure doctrine of medicine [1811] in 1827, meanwhile, had appeared "Homoeopathic" ('those who cure with homeopathy' in the plural) in the translation of an article by GG Gross published the first issue the Italian version of ' Archives of Homoeopathic Medicine edited by Joseph Belluomini Lucca (1776-1854).
And then, in the next decade: the noun "homeopathic" (for "follower of homeopathy, '" in the plural, and perhaps in the pejorative sense, resorted in 1833 in two issues of the Journal Piemontese ; " allopathy "(adjective) in 1834 on the Italian Library in a critical review of a translation of a text hanhemanniano appeared in Venice in 1833;" homeopathy "" homeopathy "around 1838, in Annali di medicina omiopatica per la Sicilia ; infine “omeopata” nel 1840 (quasi 140 anni prima di quanto registrato nello Zingarelli, ma potrebbe benissimo essere un caso isolato) in una Breve cicalata sull’Omiopatia del medico senese Baldassarre Bufalini, pubblicata sui romani Annali medico-chirurgici .
Si tratta di risultati preliminari e nuovi studi che collochino le origini dell’omeopatia all’interno del contesto culturale, politico, sociale e scientifico dell’Italia pre-unitaria sono necessari anche per meglio investigare le questioni relative al lessico e alla sua stabilizzazione. Ma da questa rapida carrellata. is quite obvious that this was formed rather early (certainly before they could tell us what the existing lexicographic tools). In this formation seems to have been foreign to the climate of controversy between supporters of the new practice imported from across the Alps and the proponents of physician supply: proceedings from the outset, homeopathy was able to raise and that even today raises.
[1] According to some sources (see Tiberi & Verga, 2007: 97), for the first time the term homeopathy would appear in 1801 on 'Osservatore doctor, medical journal published in Naples relation to the use of belladonna contro la scarlattina, proposta da Hahnemann in un suo lavoro di quell'anno. Purtroppo non è stato possibile localizzare una collezione della rivista per controllare il riferimento.
Bibliografia
Cortellazzo, Manlio; & Zolli, Paolo (1999). DELI : Dizionario etimologico della lingua italiana [2a edizione]. Bologna: Zanichelli.
Michel, J-B.; Shen, Y. K.; Aiden, A. P.; Veres, A.; Gray, M. K.; Team, T. G. B.; Pickett, J. P.; Hoiberg, D.; Clancy, D.; Norvig, P.; Orwant, J.; Pinker, S.; Nowak, M. A.; & Aiden, E. L. (2011, January 14). Quantitative Analysis of Culture Using Millions of Digitized Books. Science 331 (6014): 176-182, doi: 10.1126/science.1199644
Negro, Antonio, & Negro, Francis F. (2007). Bibliography homeopathic Italian 1822-1914. Milan: Franco Angeli
Nocentini, Alberto (2010). L 'etymological: the vocabulary of Italian. Milan: Le Monnier.
Tiberi, Anna & Verga, Emanuele (2007). Clipboard history of the origins of homeopathy in Italy. In Negro & Negro cit., 97-103.
Toso, Fiorenzo (2005). Backdating and certificates from the early nineteenth century and early-twentieth-century sources. Zeitschrift für Philologie Romanische 121 (3): 426-475, doi: 10.1515/ZRPH.2005.426
Zingarelli, Nicola (2010). Lo Zingarelli Italian dictionary [12th edition]. Bologna: Zanichelli.

Sunday, February 6, 2011

What Is The Purpose Of X Server

Convegno: Ancient Egyptian demonology - A comparative perspective, Bonn, 28.02/01.03.2011

(via Agade -Mailinglist)

***
From Rita Lucarelli
==================== ================
ANCIENT EGYPTIAN Demonology
A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE

Bonn, 28.02 - 01.03 2011

Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn
Institute for Art History and Archaeology
Regina-Pacis-Weg 7 - Exercise Room 4

PROGRAM

Monday, February 28 9:00
Prof. Dr. Ludwig Morenz


9:15 Welcome Dr. Rita Lucarelli (Bonn University)
Introducing The Ancient Egyptian Demonology Project: a categorization, typology, and classification of the demonic entities in ancient Egypt.

The sources and aim of this project will be further illustrated in the following lectures:

9:30 Prof. Dr. Ludwig Morenz (Bonn University)
classification problems of the religious world. What is a nTr?

10:00 Dr. Kasia Szpakowśka (Swansea University)
Practical Demon-Keeping: methods for dealing with hostile demonic entities in ancient Egypt

10.30 Coffee Pause

10.45 Dr. Rita Lucarelli (Bonn University)
Apotropaic gods, protective genii or malevolent creatures? Issues of classifications in the world of demons: the vignette of Spell 182 of the Book of the Dead

11.15 Dr. Panagiotis Kousoulis (University of the Aegean)
Apophis and his sister: the demonisation of venomous bites and agents in Egypt and abroad

11.45 Open discussion

12.15 Lunch

13.30 Prof. Dr. H-W. Fischer-Elfert (University of Leipzig)
Steckbrief eines nubischen(?) Dämonen - For tradition and nature of Sehaq (eq)

14:00 Judith Weingarten, MA (British School at Athens)
From Egyptian Taweret to 'Minoan genius': the development of a demon in Minoan Crete

14:30 Anne-Caroline Rendu Loisel ( Geneva University)
Exorcism and demons in Ancient Mesopotamia

15:00 Open discussion 15.30 Coffee break



15:45 Prof. Dr. Heinz-Josef Fabry (Bonn University)
demons believe in the Old Testament and the monotheism - a ratio determination

16:15 Philipp Kubisch, MA (Bonn University)
to ancient Indian demonology

16:45 Prof. Dr. Silvana Carotenuto (University of Naples - Orientale)
Isis, Kore, and Cleopatra: Three Sublime Feminine Demons

17.15 Open discussion

19.00 Evening Lecture at the Akademisches Kunstmuseum.
Prof. Dr. Klaus Schmidt (Deutsches Archäologisches Institut, Berlin)
The iconic world of Göbekli Tepe - Demons and Monsters of the Stone Age?

20.00 Guided visit of the Egyptian Collection of Bonn University and reception in the Egyptian Museum

Tuesday, March 1

9.00 Prof. Dr. Jacques van der Vliet (Leiden University/ Radboud University Nijmegen)
Engaging the demons in late-antique Egypt

9.30 Dr. Heinz Felber (Köln University)
Only "something acrid and extremely fowl"? Perceptions of good and evil spirits in the Coptic Life of Antony

10.00 Coffee Pause

10.15 Prof. Dr. Birgit Krawietz (Freie Universität, Berlin)
Surviving Monotheism. Jinn and the Arabic Islamic World

10.45 Christian Klinger, MA (Bonn University)
Shape-shifting and Transformation in Mesoamerica - The Wáay-beings in a diachronic perspective

11.15 Closing session - New Perspectives in Demonology

12.15 Lunch

13.30 Visit to the Mesoamerican Collection of Bonn University and to the Book of the Dead Project (Oxfordstrasse 15)

The conference is sponsored by the Book of the Dead Project - Nordrhein-Westfälischen Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Künste

***

see on demonology in ancient Egypt, the organizer of the conference, following the recent encyclopedia entry (with ample bibliography):

Lucarelli, Rita (2010) Demons (benevolent and malevolent ) . In DIELEMAN, Jacco & Wendrich, Willeke (eds.). UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology , Los Angeles.