Credit Cards Australia Bad Credit Rating Uk

08/28/2009


Last night I watched it again Jupiter. The seeing was not the best. For most of the night was enough to move the focus slightly extrafocale to see the current high-altitude turbulence. Jupiter appeared as seen through the exhaust trail of an aircraft. Focusing on the current Jupiter was no longer visible but the image was not sharp. Even in these conditions, the aperture of 10 cm did not produce any improvement. In fact you could see the details that were still less.
Later when Jupiter was high, there has been a better time that lasted about three quarters of an hour. During this time I could zoom in a bit 'more (instead of 170x 260X) and the image remained sharp enough. I found this picture online, which is a little later at the time of my observations. Overall, the picture makes it quite a good idea of \u200b\u200bwhat was visible. In fact the image was recorded at the telescope, but it was necessary to fix attention on a small area at a time. Some details visible in the photos were vanishing from the truth (in practice only in the equatorial zone is sensed there was something green, but had not seen the festoons of the photo). On the contrary other details were more marked from the truth. For example, the small dark area below the oval was much more evident.
I scored some of the details that were visible: more than a second oval oval uncertain (seen once), the STZ before the pole, while the NEB there were several areas with sloping trend (I have marked a) and zones a lighter color. Besides there were some areas that could have been clearer look of the oval. Here the photo does not make the contrast of reality. Several divisions and other details (for esempiop northern hemisphere) were visible but I have not scored more.

How Does Normal Period Blood Look Like

Continuing to explore ....


Yesterday I went for the fourth time the Three Peaks. The weather forecast said that it would be open to the 23, but that there were more clouds and thunderstorms to the south And it did. The panoramic photo (click to enlarge) is made at 23.09, when the sky was opening up. As expected in the South were thunderstorms and clouds that were visible along the horizon line. Also this time so I could not see the true pontenzialiutà of this site, but I've had a taste, with the beautiful Milky Way down on the horizon the clouds. Kaus Australis, the star at the bottom of the "teapot" when the photo is 5 ° in height (azimuth 206 °). I estimate that the horizon in that direction is about 2 ° high.
peaks at about 7 ° South are high. E 'visible Sgr theta-1, which at the time of the photo is 8 ° high. (Azimuth 184 °). Towards the eastern horizon
down again. Except for some peak on the horizon is an average of 2 ° -3 ° high.
On this occasion, you see clouds up to about 6-7 ° high. I think they are clouds over the plains or at least halfway, and illuminated from beneath the plains. Misurina is visible in the lower right, accompanied by a halo of light that is the hotel that I have photographed lighthouse in the previous article. I expect the sky disappearing clouds and moisture to become much better until the horizon line. When the fog disappeared Misurina disappeared on the lights of the lighthouse (though I think it's one of the cases to apply once the new regional law The ILO).
course, if the horizon was covered by mountains south there would be no view of distant clouds. But it would be just a way to ignore the problem. The plain to the south is 140 km. A South East 90. TITUS Overall, the picture does not seem dissimilar from those of average Americans p arches, where 200 km produce flashes of light along the horizon as these.

When the sky finally opened at all, the Milky Way at the zenith was well defined, the lot of North blackest coal, and the SQM measured between 21:55 and 21.60 (the Milky Way). I do not think can score more, because that is the light of the Milky Way. I estimate a visual magnitude limite di circa 6.8, usando le stesse stelle di riferimento che ho detto in precedenza.
Verso il mattino si è vista la Luce zodiacale molto bene. Sembrava quasi inquinamento luminoso, ed era molto più luminosa della stessa Via Lattea. Inutile dire che non era colorata di giallo né era percepibile la presunta differenza di colore con la Via Lattea (bianca), come invece direbbe Bortle (non sono il primo a osservare che su questo punto della colorazione la scala di Bortle ha qualche imprecisione). La Via Lattea invernale appariva come una fascia chiara nel cielo. Sotto c'era una fascia sensibilmente più scura, circa in corrispondenza di Andromeda. Sotto ancora, in Toro, Ariete, Persci c'era di nuovo del chiaro. Dalla parte simmetrica del cielo, West, more distance from the Milky Way in the sky was dark as Andromeda and even more bright and nonc'er no band corresponding to the Taurus-Pisces. The horizon was polluted South
as mentioned, but it must be said that the picture was taken with prolonged exhibitions Exhibitions (30 ", ISO 1600, F3, 5) and does not reflect the real live feeling. In fact, looking at the South could not be discern the clouds like in the picture, but only a slight flare. Least stood out the color of the clouds. The clouds at the top, like the one that covers Jupiter, appeared dark (though the photo shows that are dimly lit). You could see only the halo around Jupiter.

One great thing about this site is seeing. After the experience of the two previous times I have been monitoring the weather seeing of meteoblue and I could see that, on average, about twice the seeing is better than plain. It seems to me that the thing can be justified if one considers that the observing site is over the worst layers of the atmosphere (not in a basin as Casera Razzo). The fact is that last night the seeing was excellent.

We observed Jupiter. You could also use higher magnifications, but I wanted to observe 260X, to enjoy an image with a wild fineness of detail and engraving that I have rarely had at home. To understand, I could see the rise of the Red Spot. He saw "half" al'orizzonte! Not only that the stain had its color, SEB another well-defined color, and the area that separates the SEB from the spot (well resolved) yet another color. The NEB can be resolved in detail each of which had a shade of their own and different from others. Of course we have not been there for so guardareb Jupiter, because we went to do deep sky, but there is no doubt that this is also a site to make high resolution.
Since I'm on the subject of planets, I mention the observation of Uranus, which we have seen three satellites, and Neptune (a satellite). Before leaving we also saw a 6-Mars, "which showed the stage, caps and some detail on the surface (but it was choppy on board one of the Three Peaks).

To go to the Deep Sky objects: I left with a rather long list, with different exotic objects, but then the "negotiations" with Marco (who had his list) have led to a compromise.

An object that I want to mention now, although we have observed in mid-night, is NGC 6946. I did it on purpose to observe once again check the level of detail visible. I could see the spirals, and I could also imagine different nodes of stars along the spiral. Do not think I've ever seen so well. The core of what was to him: more light and fine. Finally, you could feel the faint glow of the entire galaxy. We watched a bit the 'at all magnifications but the best came out to 170x with the Pentax 10.5 and 260X with the 7 Nagler. The fact that the galaxy was in the darker part of the sky, and seing played in favor. In particular, the seeing allowed to use magnification while maintaining high image contrast. The stars (those sufficiently weak) were in focus in the center of the field by a dot and a flash. Too bad the board is also correct in Newton. I wanted a Paracorr! A

secono object on which the seeing was crucial was the planetary nebula NGC 6886. The nebula has a diameter of a few seconds of arc and is reported to be stellar in appearance, but at 260X, focusing on, the stars formed the head of a pin, while she remained increasingly blurred. A fire could feel the pinpoint stars and the nebula as a fuzzy ball.

Abell 43. A nebuolsa planeatria that we could see the 130x (better filter). To me it seemed to receive a reinforcement ring. IC1295
also observed, with the globular near 6712. I'm not sure that he saw the small planet in the midst of two (PN G25.3-4.6), which incidentally does not even see in this picture .
Look also at the global 6818, and the dark nebula Barnard 150 (near NGC6946), which saw the largest nodule at 86x, but I did not follow (we did not change quickly for the eye), the stringy part.
Unsuccessful attempt identify BSI 149, Sh2-136, BSI 152, but perhaps more for lack of organization and quickly (they were not in the list that Mark wanted to go beyond!).
NGC 7023, osservatra like a light with some wrinkling around the central star. Note also the two
Gaassie NGC 7332-7339, which is perhaps a bit 'weaker than in this photo .
Finally on my list have saved some Abell. The 45, 61, 71 and 72 ... but now I can not remember what they were visible and what not! The next time I write, I should also observe only 20 items instead of doing the marathon to observe 70.

List Of Marco, we did:
NGC 6384, which I have a percept elongation and "something" of spiraling. In fact it seemed to me a bar with a ring. NGC6572 (no comment). Barnard's Galaxy (vaguely visible at 86x, at 56x almost gone (unfortunately we have observed several items in the unfavorable sky.) NGC6907, 7184 (no comment). NGC 6886, which I mentioned above.
We observed in the Vulpecula open clusters and nebulae 6820, 6830 and 6823. was faintly discernible through the haze before the eye as he watched a UHC filter with the 32 mm eyepiece (56x). Also in the Vulpecula 6813.
Finally, NGC 6842 (no comment).

this observing session, more than others, but I convinced that you should limit the number of items in the list, and, above all, should observe good and slowly, just taking notes and maybe even doing the drawings. Otherwise it remains just a list of what we have seen but can not remember how you have seen.

How To Cure Gallbladder Polyps

Even the Three Peaks. 19/08/2009


Cassiopeia and Perseus rises behind one of the Three Peaks, to 00,54, 23 August 2009. The mountain in the foreground is lit by debolemte car that was coming, would otherwise have been as black as the background.
for the third time I came here to better understand the quality of this observing site. Even this time the conditions were ideal: in the afternoon a storm front had passed e, sebbene le Tre Cime fossero ormai sotto il cielo sereno, verso Sud si potevano vedere ancora le nuvole e il temporale allontanarsi. Le nuvole sono state visibili per tutta la notte anche quando erano sopra la pianura e le condizioni non sono state mai perfette. Tuttavia questa volta ho potuto capire molte cose.
La prima è che Misurina e Auronzo hanno un effetto limitatissimo sul sito osservativo, se le condizioni climatiche locali sono buone. Le due volte precedenti le luci diffuse di Misurina erano dovute a nebbiolina e umidità che si estendevano fino alla altezza del luogo di osservazione. Questa volta la situazione meteo locale era buona: non c'era umidità, vento a tratti sostenuto e temperatura di 5°C. Misurina e Auronzo erano finalmente ridimensionate a few lights in the darkness of their valleys and did not produce halos that extends above the skyline.
Instead, further, the situation was quite different. From up here the view stretches far away, and in some directions, the horizon is negative (especially to Friuli where the line of sight passes over the sky of roughly Casera Razzo and over mountains about 2200 meters, which are less high share of observation). The clouds above the plain fiulana (100 km away!), Which were in sight, appears to be illuminated from below. If the horizon was hidden would not have seen, but the light coming from there would still potutto illuminate the sky of the observation point above us (it's what happens Casera Razzo and partly to Peralba, where the horizon is not visible, but there comes the light that illuminates the sky).
From here you could see the least guilty. I made panoramic pictures made at different times of the night. As the clouds moved away situazine the best but it was always a degree of brightness of the atmosphere above the plain. I easily detected Udine, Veneto plain, Cortina, Trentino and Alto Adige.
The amount of light coming from the plains (100 km from Udine to 150-200 km in the rest of the plain) is not much. The zenith, and this is good news, it was 21.60 on the Swan! And this in a situation where the skies of the plain shone probably more than normal. I'm pretty sure that above Casera Razzo fly at the same time much more light than usual and that the sky was so below average. Here, even in below average sky is saved. But unfortunately it is not perfect: the greatest flaw is that the whole southern horizon is not perfectly dark. Do not you badly, but you can not see the airglow in the South and the contrast is lowered. I'm talking about a band of about ten degrees above the horizon. More on the situation quickly becomes good.
Constellation Capricorn seemed like the "high". I saw the Southern Fish, the teapot that sank in the mountains. There was a bit 'towards the horizon of extinction. I think it was the other side of the coin delle cattive condizioni meteo a Sud. Alle 2.37 la stella Iota Piscis Austrinis (Mv 4.34) era visibile ad una altezza di 8°, e non era certo il limite. Theta, mv 5.01, era altrettanto evidente, alla altezza di 10°. Se assumo grossolanamente che l'intensità di queste stelle fosse simile alle stelle di mv 6 allo zenith, posso stimare l'estinzione in circa 1-1.5 magnitudini a 8-10°. Poichè a questa altezza la linea di vista attraversa circa 5-7 volte lo spessore di atmosfera allo zenit, ne consegue una stima indicativa di estinzione zenitale pari a 0.17-0.25 magnitudini, che potrebbe essere vero per un sito a 2400 metri. Ma non è detto che la trasparenza in direzione Sud fosse la stessa che allo zenit.
Allo zenit ho stimato la mv limite in 6.8 (stars in Pegasus 6.80 and 6.73 in Hercules, which I mentioned in previous reports were visible in averted with a degree of continuity). The only thing a bit 'out of tune was the visibility of M33 with the naked eye, which did not seem sublime.

This time we chose the square for the comments higher. Thomas and I were with my 40 cm: Mirko has not achieved because the telescope ready to load into the car broke a screw in the support of the secondary.
The choice of the site can also see the high rise of costllazioni east (we could see the zodiacal light). Unfortunately it seems that this square is also preferred by lovers of mountain climbing, that did not allla get nothing but dribs and drabs during the first part of the night. The typical behavior was to arrive in the square, stay a while 'time to decide on which parking space (there were so many who obviously was difficiel choose). Someone did several manual conveyor changing place, of course, with its headlights on. Then followed the preparation stage dellla equipment and finally the lights went out ... just in time for the next arrival. I think for them both imprtante in the front row (someone had even put the boots in a row under the machine ready for use) to be ready to "shoot" the rising of the sun (the guess is that there is a kind of " unreported race who comes first "). Some had even placed at the base of the rock, above the scree and slept in the wall. "Slept" I think esgerato often as every turn on the lights and I have not slept well.
We tried to make little noise. But I guess they thought we were crazy to watch the sky. One thing is certain: there are more passionate amateur climbers. Or rather, amateurs who come to observe the sky in places like that. Amateurs who "can not move" and looking to the skies as dark and as preposterous is seeing any. I do not know however that we are Apassionata the mountain "can not move" and that are climbing the stairwell. Let

List of the observed objects. I mention those on my list. Thomas has even more pointed, especially while doing the views.
NGC6946 was one of the best views ever of this item. The spirals were visible: marcatissime not like those of M51 but still visible and not merely theoretical. To me it seemed even to see some lumps of light in spirals. The outer halo of the galaxy was, and you could see the sky, beyond a certain distance became darker (as if there was a dark cloud around). The nucleus was clear and detached from the rest of the galaxy. Another pop 'of darkness and transparency and diameter Equest object should be spectacular.
We then moved on IC1369 and the nearby nebulosa oscura LDN 970 (Barnard 361); NGC7048 era un dischetto ben visibile; NGC7008; NGC6818; La Helix (secondo Tommaso una delle visioni migliori di sempre, io non ne sono sicuro). Ho osservato Barnard 143 e 142 nel binocolo 15x70.
Siamo poi andati sulla Bubble Nebula, osservandola a diversi ingrandimenti. Era possibile vedere bene, intorno a 170x, la parte più intensa del'arco e la parte più intensa della nebulosità come in questa foto .
Del quintetto di Stephan abbiamo visto forse anche la sesta. La mv limite al telescopio era 16.1 (forse 16.6) a 360x. La IC1296, vicino a M57 era intuibile a ingrandimenti intorno a 260x.
Abbiamo osservato una manciata di Arp e la Jones 1, che a dire il vero a me seemed less than engraved Sivell. We observed M27-magnification supported and I'm to see details inside the stem and ears. M76, however, beyond the usual stem, showed a very faint outer halo 360X.
All in all, most of the objects was more visible than usual, with several exceptions. I definitely missed several things.
The seeing was good, although not paragonabiole than last Thursday. The definition, thanks to the extraction system of the boundary layer was also good on deep sky objects, and perhaps this helped to grasp the details of such irregularities in the spiral NGC6946 or M27 in detail.

Plasma Donation Idaho

observations of Jupiter on the evening of August 19. It was to test the new system of extraction of the boundary layer, which will make a separate article. The system works by sucking air from the case of the mirror. In front of the mirror is a diaphragm opening of the mirror itself, so that the only entrance to the air is an annulus formed along the edge of the mirror and diaphragm. In this way the air is sucked from the whole circumference of the mirror, and "pulling" the boundary layer. This was the first serious test and it went better than expected. The boundary layer is continuously removed and the image is similar to what you have in the first minutes after an energetic cooling front. But here the process is continuous, there is now and the quality still remains (as the cooling front should be repeated periodically).

so I could concentrate on the planet. At 245x the image was immediately sharp. I have not had to do the usual "scale." He could also accept higher magnifications, but I found that the number of details that I could see was higher than I could draw. So I decided to limit the magnification to 245x, in an attempt to facilitate the work of design (these are my third and fourth drawing of Jupiter). I had many difficulties both in locating the correct details that drew (after I realized that I had drawn that I had not messi nel posto giusto o alla scala giusta). I disegni sono quindi un po' distorti. L'altra difficoltà è che non riuscivo a disegnare tutti i dettagli. Dopo che avevo disegnato un particolare, riguardandolo mi accorgevo che non sarebbe stato proprio fatto così.

Comunque sia questo è il risultato. Il Primo disegno è stato fatto alle 20.45 TU. La zona polare Sud (in alto) mostrava chiaramente la divisione con la SSTeZ (per la nomenclatura mi riferisco a questo http://stars5.netfirms.com/jupnom.jpg ). Nella SSTeZ c'erano delle aree più scure e in particolare un ovalino bianco seguito da un'area più scura. Devo anche dire che il giorno seguente, alle Tre Cime , ho potuto vedere Giove ancora meglio, polar area and the same was resolved in finer dettgli and dashes. The STeZ was visible, especially with some "reinforcements". SEB are generally divided into three. The Three Peaks was resolved in a dense texture and indescribable indisegnabile (for me).
I then set the focus on the NEB (skipping the equatorial zone) because it showed interesting undulations. A first interesting point is left of the drawing, where the NEB narrowed almost to a point. From there started a thin banner on the one hand and waving the other side The first of these seemed to stretch with a puff or to touch the NTeB. Three Peaks to the haunting after this area was incredible: the structure of the NEB can be resolved in a myriad of puffs, riccioli e altro e ognuno aveva una tonalità di colore diversa, dal marrioncino al grigiastro al verdastro! La seconda e la terza ondulazione erano circa della stessa dimensione della prima, mentre la quarta si ampliava. In corrispondenza delle ondualzioni dalla parte opposta c'erano altrettanti pennacchi, ma il secondo e terzo non apparivano sottili come il primo. Avevano piuttosto l'aspetto di zampe di gallina.
Nel secondo disegno ho cercato di ridisegnare il pianeta per vedere se riuscivo a farlo meglio, ma non mi sembra di esserci riuscito. A parte la rotazine, i dettagli sono gli stessi e le differenze sono da attribuire alla mia "precisione" di disegno.

Volvo Aq125a Engine Equivalent

Jupiter Return of the Three Peaks


Yesterday I returned to the Three Peaks, where I had been in September 2008 . That time I found a lot of mist and a bit 'light pollution from Misurina.
Yesterday, initially, the Three Peaks was not planned, but the weather forecast indicated some risk on both Casera Razzo, both Peralba (addiritttura where a storm was expected around 23). Now were going to come out. Faith and Wide, Verona and Trento were parties to do the route via Bolzano, Val Pusteria, Dobbiaco, measuring spoon, Auronzo, and then on to Peralba or Casera Razzo. When I heard that they would move to Misurina I checked the weather forecast for the area, which were the best. So
was that I'm back there. There were several reasons to return: first the horizon, that the Three Peaks is the best: only a few degrees above the geometrical one, as you can see the panoramic photo (taken in early July when I had been there for other reasons). Secondly, the study of light pollution Peralba of Casera Razzo , and Casera Sivell , has convinced me that compared to maps of Cinzano, screens count a lot of mountains, and that three sites are shown above Friuli (first two) or they are too close to population centers (the third). The three peaks are much more secure than the plain. For example, South is the massive Marmarole, 3000 meters high, which does not obstruct the horizon just because the observing site is at 2400 meters high. Cortina is also well screen. Stay True, the "defect" Misurina, in line of sight, and Auronzo (in line of sight but far from the refuge). However, in the first visit to the Three Peaks was a lot of moisture, and so I thought it best condiziuoni in these two "flaws" may be negligible compared, for example, those of the other sites mentioned. In other words, it seemed appropriate to visit the site again to see what was in the best weather conditions.

Unfortunately the weather was not "better." There were clouds and cloudiness, but fortunately we were at the highest level of the clouds and much of the sky was visible. In short, the situation was similar to last time. The veils and clouds over Misurina were lit. During the night I moved on the side of Auronzo and there was a "sea" of veiling below, illuminated from below by Auronzo. Of course, if they were thicker clouds, lights and Auronzo Misurina were hidden, but they were so thin and milky.
We did, however, the consideration that, after all, had gone well, because we were mostly above the clouds and we could observe the sky, even if the appointment was postponed with ideal conditions. There "under" was to be worse, and safe "down there" was both the site of Peralba is the site of Casera Razzo.

Another thing we noticed was that the seeing was good. In a sense we were on the most wicked atmosphere, with clouds and turbulence more below us. Casera Razzo, however, is often in the wake of the upstream Tudaio and rarely seeing is good.
So we have seen (also) Jupiter. It could easily push the magnification and, despite this, the image was full of details. We thus had the opportunity to compare three different telescopes on the planet (it seems crazy to do high-res on a site for deep sky, but in reality, if seeing is too deep there buoon earns e non poco). Per fare la storia breve ne è venuta fuori l'ennesima smentita della leggenda che vuole che i piccoli rifrattori siano più adatti dei grandi riflettori per fare planetario visuale. C'era un NP101, che ha potuto lavorare a 270x! Il mio 40 cm avrebbe potuto usare ingrandimenti maggiori, ma sono stato a 260x. Il 30 cm riflettore di Andrea è stato su ingrandimenti analoghi.
L'immagine era indubitabilmente più ricca di particolari nei due riflettori, nonostante il seeing, che secondo le leggende astrofilo-rifrattoristiche dovrebbe impedire a strumenti oltre 10-15 cm di esprimersi e dovrebbe vedere vincente il piccolo rifrattore. Non è stato così: nel rifrattore c'erano anche meno colori. I dettagli eran meno evidenti e meno contrastati. In qualche caso era ancora possibile, avendo visto qualche cosa nel grande, ritrovarlo con più difficoltà nel 10 cm. C'era un piccolo ovale bianco su cui ci siamo fissati, che era ben visibile nel 40 cm ma invisibile nel 10 cm. Il 30 cm di Andrea, con specchio sottile, era ben acclimatato. Nel mio caso ho usato il sistema di aspirazione dello strato limite che descriverò a breve.
Una cosa che ho notato è che Fede, abituato al rifrattore, guardando l'immagine luminosa nel 40 cm ha detto che era troppo luminosa. Per me il contrario: l'immagine nel 10 cm era troppo scura. Evidentemente ci si deve abituare. Mettendo il diaframma eccentrico di 10 cm sul mio, l'immagine era del tutto simile a quella del rifrattore (confermando fatti teorici ovvi - per chi li conosce).

Ho anche fatto lo star test allo Skywatcher 30 cm. Che dire: nessuna aberrazione sferica, un'ottima correzione del bordo e solo qualche segno di forzatura (un lembo "schiacciatlo") che però non comprometteva il risultato. Sono sicuro che Andrea allenterà i fermi dello specchio... Ah dimenticavo: i "fringe violetti"! Sfuocavao avanti e indietro per stanarli ma niente da fare. E' proprio uno specchio apocromatico!

Ritornando allla valutazione del sito, se l'orizzonte è buono, se la quota è tale che spesso si sta sopra la turbolenza, se spesso si sta pure fuori delle nuvole (e si salva la serata) la cosa che manca è vedere che cosa succede con il meteo giusto. Return.

The quality of the dark was good. The Swan we measured the zenith (the Milky Way) between 21.60 and 21:50 (21:55 on average). Later, with the Swan a bit 'move, the readings ranged from 21.60 to 21.72. It 'possible that this site without humidity and clouds is even better? Probably.
The transparency was not great, because obviously there was some haze. Some clouds coming from the north appeared dark against the sky background (just above the clouds and Misurina Auronzo were cloudy). Light pollution in Cortina seemed a small thing, even in comparison with that for example, St. Stephen's seen Sivell. Since there were no clouds, however, I did the usual panoramic photos.
I saw the star of Hercules in 6.73, while in Pegasus I saw the HD 219310 (mv 6.34) almost directly and, at times, the HD 219487 (mv 6.57) and HD 219418 (mv 6.80). Towards the south the sky darkened and / or fade according to prevail from time to time the clouds of luminescent Misurina or that they were covered by clouds darker. M31 was visible to the naked eye with its structure (you could see the core and the halo). M33 was "awkward." Since it was dark there was probailmente extinction above the norm.

car parks, this season, are used by hikers who sleep the night before the climb. There were several cars with people sleeping. When we arrived a inglese stava montando un piccola tenda. "Montando" si fa per dire, perchè era del tipo che si sviluppa da sola buttandola per terra. Dopo un po' si è avvicinato dicendoci che "non potevamo stare là" perchè lui (essendo in vacanza) doveva dormire per fare la scalata il giorno dopo. Qualcuno di noi (credo Wide) gli ha risposto che noi (essendo in vacanza) dovevamo guardare il cielo per dormire felici il girono dopo. Pretendeva che smontassimo gli strumenti e ce ne andassimo, ma alla fine ha preso la tenda e ha cambiato posto. Più tardi è arrivato un camper: altri scalatori. Hanno manovrato per qualche minuto (evidentemente c'era troppo spazio e non riuscivano a decidere in che punto fermarsi, in più avranno pensato di aiutarci with the headlights to see in all this darkness that was). Throughout the huge open relativcamente have decided to get close to us! They then turned on several lights and went out a long time to turn over the equipment. They finally turned off and put himself to sleep. When it was our time to leave we have repaid the kindness by turning various lights so they do not feel alone in the dark and we drove out evil spirits with the Eastern Rite.
Seriously, living with this kind of "users" of the mountain seems to me problematic. Fortunately, that ended the August issue no longer arises in these terms. Ah ... There were two sleeping bag in the PEL under the stars without a tent on the ground beside the car!

Ho provato gli Ethos! Per la maggior parte del tempo ho usato l'ethos 10, a 183x. Ho avuto qualche problema a mandare a fuoco quelli più corti (il 6 non c'era verso). Ho usato anche il 17 a 107x e quasi un grado di campo. Begli oculari, ma ripensandoci non sono molto adatti a un Newton F4,5 che non ha un bordo corretto (è un po' uno spreco).
Fede ha usato l'NP 101 per la maggior parte del tempo a bassi ingrandimenti (tipo Pan 24 mm a 22.5x, o Ethos 10 a 54x) facendo gandi carrelalte della Via Lattea e degli oggetti immersi nel loro habitat. La correzione al bordo in questo caso paga e ha senso stare su oculari a grande campo. Ricordo la Swan nebula con la sua forma a cigno capovolto nel mezzo della Via Lattea, e il Velo tutto intero, including the triangle of Pickering. We observed several objects
classics. Among these 17 M31 ethos showed dark bands than ever before. M13 was resolved in NP 101, in the sense that, although very weak, Garn of the M13 stars that give the tentacles were visible. Here Faith pushed magnification.
M22 in 40 cm, with Ethos 10. We also saw different densities of stars in the background of the Milky Way globular cluster to the left and right (azimuth). Observed the Seyfert's Sextet, which we saw a couple of galassiette. The planetary NGC6742 of 15 mv in Dragon seemed like a good diskette. I've also seen Neptune as a blue dot and the satellite Oberon. Marco also observed Uranus. An M27 with filters of various type in which it seemed for the first time to see different grades and some structure in both the stem are in the ears (perhaps seeing?). I tried to convince others that the ears appear red and the green seems to stem (the colors are just the opposite but who describes it describes in colorful colr reversed) but there was nothing to do. Andrea said it was all green.

The list is longer but of course these are the things that impressed me most.

Come back we stopped to photograph this shining example of light pollution. From this building just more disturbed that the whole Misurina. With the new regional law must think about light pollution turn off those lights. I think that will signal the situation.